Search for: All records

Global climate change has triggered an urgent need for predicting the reorganization of Earth’s biodiversity. For dioecious species (those with separate sexes), it is unclear how commonly unique climate sensitivities of females and males could influence projections for species-level responses to climate change. We developed demographic models of range limitation, parameterized from geographically distributed common garden experiments, with females and males of a dioecious grass species (Poa arachnifera) throughout and beyond its range in the south-central U.S. We contrasted predictions of a standard female-dominant model with those of a two-sex model that accounts for feedbacks between sex ratio and vital rates. Both model versions predict that future climate change will induce a poleward shift of niche suitability beyond current northern limits. However, the magnitude of the poleward shift was underestimated by the female-dominant model because females have broader temperature tolerance than males but become mate-limited under female-biased sex ratios, which are forecasted to become more common under future climate. Our results illustrate how explicitly accounting for both sexes can enhance population viability forecasts and conservation planning for dioecious species in response to climate change. 

Species' distributions and abundances are shifting in response to climate change. Most species harbor microbial symbionts that have the potential to influence these responses. Mutualistic microbial symbionts may provide resilience to environmental change by protecting their hosts from increasing stress. However, environmental change that disrupts these interactions may lead to declines in hosts or symbionts. Microbes preserved within herbarium specimens offer a unique opportunity to quantify changes in microbial symbiosis across broad temporal and spatial scales. We asked how the prevalence of seed-transmitted fungal symbionts of grasses (Epichloe endophytes), which can protect hosts from abiotic stress, have changed over time in response to climate change, and how these changes vary across host species' ranges. Specifically, we analyzed 2,346 herbarium specimens of three grass host species collected over the last two centuries (1824 -- 2019) for the presence or absence of endophyte symbiosis, and evaluated spatial and temporal trends in endophyte prevalence. We found that endophytes increased in prevalence over the last two centuries from ca. 25% prevalence to ca. 75% prevalence, on average, across three host species. We also found that changes in prevalence were associated with observed changes in seasonal climate drivers; notably increasing precipitation corresponding to each host species' peak growing season and changes in off-peak season variability in precipitation. Our analysis performed favorably in an out-of-sample predictive test with contemporary data, however we identified greater local-scale variability in endophyte prevalence in contemporary data compared to historic data, suggesting that model fusion may be an important step moving forward. Our results provide novel evidence for a cryptic biological response to climate change that may contribute to the resilience of host-microbe symbiosis through context-dependent benefits that confer a fitness advantage to symbiotic hosts under environmental change.